Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Epilogue
Has the appeals court maintained the conviction for sexual assault or ordered a new trial?
Read MoreFact-based journalism that sparks the Canadian conversation
Has the appeals court maintained the conviction for sexual assault or ordered a new trial?
Read MoreEvidence, credibility, and doubt—appealing a sexual assault conviction
Read MoreSexual assault survivors of a Montreal hockey “institution” are one step closer to a settlement
Read MoreThis case should have been a victory for sexual assault activists, police, and the crown. They won a conviction from a judge who believed the victim
Read MoreThe verdict arrives. And so does Marie Henein—best known for representing Jian Ghomeshi
Read MoreWhy can a witness remember many details yet be so vague about the sexual assault itself?
Read MoreWhy judges are junking legal jargon
Read More“I was stupid, I was young, I was ignorant—and that’s all I admit”
Read MoreShe says he raped her. He says he never touched her. At least one of them is lying
Read MoreIn Canada’s prisons, the horrors of segregation are most often visited on the mentally ill
Read More