Letters to the Editor: November/December 2020

On long-term Lyme, the Air India attack, sensitivity readers, and more

Logo for The Walrus

Send us a letter, email, or Tweet, or post on our Facebook page.

The End of the Lyme

In the September/October issue, Stephanie Nolen wrote about tracking one of humanity’s tiniest deadly predators.

Thanks to Stephanie Nolen for diving into the world of ticks and Lyme disease. The writer’s comment that “a small subset of those infected report a ‘chronic’ infection, although most scientists reject the idea that this could occur” is worthy of discussion. Chronic Lyme may or may not exist, but you can certainly feel unwell long after a tick bite. My bite was two years ago, and I still have not fully recovered despite spending thousands on private care and medications. For further proof, visit any Lyme support group or check in with Shania Twain, Avril Lavigne, or Justin Bieber. Meanwhile, keep tucking your pants into your socks.

Jane Litchfield
Thornbury, ON

Memory Serves

In the July/August issue, Jordan Michael Smith wrote that, thirty-five years later, few Canadians seem to acknowledge the largest terrorist attack in their country’s history.

I was glad to read Jordan Michael Smith’s story on Chandrima Chakraborty’s efforts to archive and memorialize the Air India bombing. I remember starting grade four, the fall after the attack happened, and wondering why my neighbours Thejus and Jyothi were not running to class in the morning as usual. I later learned they had been on that flight. Jyothi was a humanitarian, always looking out for those in need. She wrote poetry. These people were our friends, our neighbours, our family, and it’s so important that Chakraborty is keeping their histories alive in our national memory.

Jennifer Lee
Toronto, ON

Balancing the Books

In the July/August issue, digital editor Tajja Isen wrote about how publishers increasingly lean on outside experts to vet books for cultural insensitivity. Is it working?

Tajja Isen’s exploration of the role of sensitivity readers in book publishing is fascinating, but it omits part of the bigger picture. The Big Five publishers’ business models are built on releasing a few major titles a year, and they cannot afford to take risks when so much of their revenue depends on so few works. Their use of sensitivity readers seems less altruistic and more about producing sanitized books that are unlikely to offend. This is not true diversity, and as Isen points out, publishers should instead prioritize new and diverse authors—a first step in rectifying the homogeneity of the work we read.

Nathaniel Nichol
Seattle, WA

Reader Beware

In July, Stephen Henighan wrote about how the pandemic has pushed Canadian publishing to the brink.

In “How COVID-19 Infected the Publishing Industry,” Stephen Henighan provides a valuable overview of Canadian bookselling’s extremely precarious economic position. Although his article is occasioned by COVID-19, Henighan is right to situate the roots of our current situation in the turn-of-the-century consolidation of Canadian brands, like McClelland & Stewart, under foreign corporations, like German-owned Penguin Random House—all while these companies maintained the fiction of being Canadian publishers and continued collecting Canadian taxpayer subsidies. Meanwhile, independent bookstores, which are critically important to our national literature, have languished. While some might view his article as alarmist, Henighan has, if anything, understated the threat posed to Canadian society.

Rolf Maurer
New Star Books
Vancouver, BC

Missed Connection

In the September/October issue, Russell Smith wrote about how AI determines what’s relevant. One day, it decided his work wasn’t.

Sometimes you don’t realize you’re in love until it’s too late. Russell Smith’s Globe and Mail arts-and-culture column, the demise of which the columnist himself so incisively analyzed, is one such case. I was no regular or even benevolent reader, and I often had more criticism than praise, but I enjoyed reading Smith because he wrote on things I cared about. I remember a great column on English usage in Canada, which, as a sociolinguist, I relished critiquing. I wish I’d written in, as I’m doing now that it’s too late, encouraging Smith in his important work. He’s a linguist’s kindred spirit, but I just couldn’t see it.

Stefan Dollinger
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, BC

Send us a letter, email, or tweet, or post on our Facebook page.

411 Richmond Street East, Suite B15
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5A 3S5

Readers
“The time has come,” The Walrus said, “to talk of many things.” Send us a letter, an email (letters@thewalrus.ca), or a tweet, or post on this website. Comments may be published in any medium and edited for length, clarity, and accuracy. Mail correspondence to: 411 Richmond St. E., Suite B15, Toronto, Ontario, Canada  M5A 3S5

Enjoy What You’re Reading?

Fact-based journalism is our passion and your right.

We feature Canadian voices and expertise on stories that travel beyond our shores, and we firmly believe that this reporting can change the world around us. The Walrus covers it all with originality, depth, and thoughtfulness, bringing diverse perspectives to bear on essential conversations while setting the highest bar for fact-checking and rigour.

We’re asking readers like you to support The Walrus so we can continue to lead the Canadian conversation.
Every contribution makes a difference.
Please support The Walrus today. Thank you.
Donations of $20 or more will receive a charitable tax receipt.