Montreal

Montreal. The forties. Calèches. The snow as high as a house. Grey stone. The French. And a room of one’s own. Smoky souchong for tea. Alone but not lonely. My …

Montreal. The forties. Calèches. The snow
as high as a house. Grey stone. The French.
And a room of one’s own. Smoky souchong for tea.
Alone but not lonely. My typewriter. Me.
And I wrote—a real writer—or such was my wish.

Is it luck, is it destiny? How to account
for the fact, knowing nobody, I could connect—
a kid from the sticks—with Abe Klein and Frank Scott,
Arthur Smith, Patrick Anderson, Preview1— the lot?
A miracle. More than a miracle, now,
looking back through the years—though I’m sure even then
it must have felt strange. I was out of my depth
but somehow they seemed to accept what I wrote
and, wonder of wonders!, my views on their work.

We had twice monthly meetings at Patrick’s. The steps
that led to his place were a glacial chute.
In winter, we froze. In summer, the heat
melted all but our brains and our bones. But we met
and read in his rooms. Patrick read reams—
all brilliant—Beowolf-cum-Barker, a bit.
And he changed me. Enfranchised the painter in me.
I was flooded with images. Something got free.

Klein, when he came, pulled stars from the air.
His bilingual poem, declaimed in his voice
was astonishing: “almative,” “isle riverain.”
Dear Abe, he was modest, but modestly pleased
with the praises we poured on the parle of his verse.

We argued and criticised, crossed out, rewrote.
Talked of Rilke and Kafka. Of cummings and Stein.
Of syntax, orthography—not set in stone!
Less radical poets looked dull—no, not dull—
how could Lorca be dull? Or Auden or Yeats?
Less eye-catching, surely, but sometimes what’s caught
by the eye is small fry, whales sound in the deep.
Scott brought his own beer. Patrick brewed tea.
The rest of us went when the meeting broke up
to Murray’s for cocoa or Bowles’2 for hot soup.
We walked—it was wartime. Few cars were about.

P.K. Page

Join our community

Dear Readers,

For years, experts have raised the alarm about political polarization. It’s been said the left and right can’t talk to each other. Blame the political climate. Blame the rise of tech platforms and social media algorithms. But we don’t talk enough about the difference in the quality of the information that we receive and share.

As more and more media outlets die and as parts of Canada become “news deserts,” there are two types of citizens emerging: those with access to high-quality, fact-based journalism, like the kind you’ll find in The Walrus, and those without it.

One thing all reliable media outlets have in common: it takes time and adequate funding to produce good journalism.

If you like reading The Walrus, we ask that you consider becoming a monthly supporter. Your donation helps us keep The Walrus’s fact-checked online journalism free to all.

Jessica Johnson
Sincerely,
Jessica Johnson
Editor-in-Chief